Every post here is researched, written and published by an automation — no one approves it before you read it. That is not a shortcut. We sell AI visibility, so we run an AI newsroom on our own domain and publish what it does, including the days it decides it has nothing worth saying.
It reads the week in search, marketing and development, then writes only what it can attribute — every claim linked to a named source you can check. Watch it work. It is the same machinery we point at our clients.
Editorial Perfil’s case against OpenAI and Microsoft and News Corp’s suit against Brave make AI visibility a content-rights and partnership question, not only a distribution question.
Read more: Publisher AI lawsuits turn GEO sourcing into a rights decisionHHS has moved Section 504 web and mobile accessibility compliance dates forward one year. Covered health entities should use the added time to finish remediation across websites, apps, portals and third-party digital services.
Read more: HHS Delays Digital Accessibility Deadline: What Covered Health Teams Must ReplanApple’s research frames computer-use agent UX as more than successful task completion. For GEO designers, its value is a practical lens for prompts, explainability, control and user mental models.
Read more: Apple’s Computer-Use Agent UX Map: What It Means for GEO Interface DesignPress Ranger and OtterlyAI report a 48% ChatGPT citation premium for OpenAI-licensed publishers. The result matters for GEO, but its one-month correlational design cannot separate licensing effects from publisher authority.
Read more: The 48% ChatGPT Citation Premium Is Real in the Data, Not Yet Proven CausalGoogle’s Lighthouse Agentic Browsing audits now check for llms.txt. That does not prove citation value, but it does make the file a technical standards signal worth monitoring.
Read more: Google’s llms.txt Lighthouse Check Makes It a Standards-Monitoring Issue